Honda HR-V e:HEV Toyota C-HR

Two cars on the same rows. The figures are all here, with their sources, so you can read them yourself and decide what matters.

Comparison table

18 of these rows differ. They sit at the top. Figures come straight from the makers, indicative. A bullet (•) marks a differing row.
Honda HR-V e:HEV Toyota C-HR
Model years (differs) 2022-now 2023-now
From (indicative) (differs) € 36,990 € 35,995
Status Available Available
Fuel Hybrid Hybrid
RatingsRating figures: higher is better (scale 0-100). What each category measures is explained on the methodology page.
Reliability (differs) 79/100 83/100
Combined efficiency rating (differs) 77/100
Efficiency (differs) 74/100 81/100
Practicality (differs) 64/100 62/100
Value retention (differs) 70/100 74/100
Sustainability (environmental impact) (differs) 55/100 63/100
Specifications
Body style (differs) SUV Crossover
Power (hp) (differs) 131 140
0–100 km/h (s) (differs) 10.6 9.9
Length (mm) (differs) 4355 4362
Width (mm) (differs) 1790 1832
Height (mm) (differs) 1582 1564
Kerb weight (kg) (differs) 1381 1505
Consumption WLTP (l/100km) (differs) 5.4 4.7
Max. towing weight, braked (kg) (differs) n/a 725
Boot (l) (differs) 319 364
Seats 5 5
Doors 5 5
Top speed (km/h) 170 170

OEM datasheets + RDW + ADAC (see methodology); rating and reference dates are listed per figure

Show sources and reference dates per rating
  • Honda HR-V e:HEV · Reliability: ADAC breakdown statistics 2025 (segment) + aggregated owner reviews + RDW recall data; mature e:HEV technology · reference date 2026-05-18
  • Honda HR-V e:HEV · Combined efficiency rating: WLTP 5.4 l/100km full hybrid, low for SUV segment; editorial weighting · reference date 2026-05-18
  • Honda HR-V e:HEV · Efficiency: Owner-reported l/100km vs WLTP 5.4 (public forums) · reference date 2026-05-18
  • Honda HR-V e:HEV · Practicality: 319 l boot + 'Magic Seats' rear bench + no towing weight released; editorial weighting of specs · reference date 2026-05-18
  • Honda HR-V e:HEV · Value retention: Residual-value indication from valuation guides for compact SUV segment, Honda historically strong (indicative) · reference date 2026-05-18
  • Honda HR-V e:HEV · Sustainability (environmental impact): WLTP consumption manufacturer figure hybrid 5.4 l/100km + exhaust emissions / LCA indication ICCT 2024 · reference date 2026-05-21
  • Toyota C-HR · Reliability: ADAC breakdown statistics 2025 (Toyota hybrid historically low) + aggregated owner reviews · reference date 2026-05-18
  • Toyota C-HR · Efficiency: Owner-reported real-world consumption vs WLTP 4.7 l/100km (public forums) · reference date 2026-05-18
  • Toyota C-HR · Practicality: Boot 364 l + cramped rear seat/visibility (segment comparison, owner reviews) · reference date 2026-05-18
  • Toyota C-HR · Sustainability (environmental impact): Full-hybrid without a plug (stays fossil) + low urban consumption, indicative weighting · reference date 2026-05-18
  • Toyota C-HR · Value retention: Residual-value indication ANWB/valuation guides segment (Toyota hybrid historically strong) · reference date 2026-05-18

Who they are

A short write-up on each car, one paragraph apiece. We describe them on their own terms rather than picking a winner.

Profile · III, derde generatie (2022+)

Honda HR-V e:HEV

Compact SUV with Honda's e:HEV full hybrid and the well-known "Magic Seats" rear bench. System power 131 hp, WLTP consumption 5.4 l/100km (manufacturer figure). The 1.5 petrol engine usually serves as a generator, the wheels turn on the electric motor; at higher speed the petrol engine couples mechanically. Officially not released to tow trailers (braked towing weight 0 kg).

Profile · 1.8 Hybrid (AX20, tweede generatie)

Toyota C-HR

Full-hybrid crossover without a plug, second generation (2023). Strong point is a low urban fuel use and the Toyota hybrid reliability reputation; weak point is the modest rear space and the low towing weight (725 kg braked). Indicative starting price.

Continue

+ Compare with another model

Both cars are already filled in — just add a third to compare.

No tax or financial advice. Every figure shows its source and reference date. Always compare with an independent adviser and the official source. Source: OEM datasheets + RDW + ADAC (see methodology); rating and reference dates are listed per figure.