Mazda CX-5 Volkswagen T-Roc

Two cars on the same rows. The figures are all here, with their sources, so you can read them yourself and decide what matters.

Comparison table

17 of these rows differ. They sit at the top. Figures come straight from the makers, indicative. A bullet (•) marks a differing row.
Mazda CX-5 Volkswagen T-Roc
From (indicative) (differs) € 38,990 € 31,990
Status Available Available
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Model years 2017-now 2017-now
RatingsRating figures: higher is better (scale 0-100). What each category measures is explained on the methodology page.
Reliability (differs) 82/100 73/100
Combined efficiency rating (differs) 58/100
Efficiency (differs) 55/100 68/100
Practicality (differs) 74/100 75/100
Sustainability (environmental impact) (differs) 35/100 40/100
Value retention n/a n/a
Specifications
Body style (differs) SUV Crossover
Power (hp) (differs) 165 116
0–100 km/h (s) (differs) 10.5 10.8
Top speed (km/h) (differs) 201 189
Length (mm) (differs) 4575 4236
Width (mm) (differs) 1845 1819
Height (mm) (differs) 1680 1573
Kerb weight (kg) (differs) 1588 1304
Max. towing weight, braked (kg) (differs) 1800 1500
Boot (l) (differs) 510 445
Consumption WLTP (l/100km) (differs) 7.4 6.2
Seats 5 5
Doors 5 5

OEM datasheets + RDW + ADAC (see methodology); rating and reference dates are listed per figure

Show sources and reference dates per rating
  • Mazda CX-5 · Reliability: ADAC breakdown statistics 2025 (segment) + aggregated owner reviews + RDW recall data; mature platform since 2017 · reference date 2026-05-18
  • Mazda CX-5 · Combined efficiency rating: WLTP 7.4 l/100km petrol without hybridisation, relatively high for segment; editorial weighting · reference date 2026-05-18
  • Mazda CX-5 · Efficiency: Owner-reported l/100km vs WLTP 7.4, public forums · reference date 2026-05-18
  • Mazda CX-5 · Practicality: 510 l boot, 1,800 kg braked towing weight, editorial weighting of specs · reference date 2026-05-18
  • Mazda CX-5 · Value retention: Insufficient clear-cut residual-value data for this trim and reference date · reference date 2026-05-18
  • Mazda CX-5 · Sustainability (environmental impact): WLTP consumption manufacturer figure petrol + exhaust emissions (Euro-6d standard on current models), reference date 2026-05-21 · reference date 2026-05-21
  • Volkswagen T-Roc · Reliability: ADAC breakdown statistics 2025 (compact SUV) + aggregated owner reviews + RDW recall data · reference date 2026-05-18
  • Volkswagen T-Roc · Efficiency: Owner-reported real-world l/100km vs WLTP (public forums) · reference date 2026-05-18
  • Volkswagen T-Roc · Practicality: Boot volume + seat height + editorial segment comparison · reference date 2026-05-18
  • Volkswagen T-Roc · Value retention: Insufficient stable residual-value data for this model year in NL/DE · reference date 2026-05-18
  • Volkswagen T-Roc · Sustainability (environmental impact): WLTP consumption manufacturer figure petrol + exhaust emissions (Euro-6d standard on current models), reference date 2026-05-21 · reference date 2026-05-21

Who they are

A short write-up on each car, one paragraph apiece. We describe them on their own terms rather than picking a winner.

Profile · KF, facelift (2024)

Mazda CX-5

Compact SUV with a Skyactiv-G petrol engine, KF generation with 2024 facelift. No hybrid or mild-hybrid drive in this version: WLTP consumption around 7.4 l/100km (manufacturer figure). 510 l boot, braked towing weight 1,800 kg. Indicative starting price; check the official configurator for the current figure.

Profile · facelift (2022-2024)

Volkswagen T-Roc

Compact crossover on the MQB-A0 platform, facelifted in 2022 and since then unchanged in production. Entry is the 1.0 TSI with 116 hp; 445 litre boot, braked towing weight 1,500 kg. WLTP consumption 6.2 l/100km (manufacturer figure, not measured by us). Indicative starting price; consult the official configurator for a current figure.

Continue

+ Compare with another model

Both cars are already filled in — just add a third to compare.

No tax or financial advice. Every figure shows its source and reference date. Always compare with an independent adviser and the official source. Source: OEM datasheets + RDW + ADAC (see methodology); rating and reference dates are listed per figure.