Hyundai Tucson Volvo XC60

Two cars on the same rows. The figures are all here, with their sources, so you can read them yourself and decide what matters.

Comparison table

20 of these rows differ. They sit at the top. Figures come straight from the makers, indicative. A bullet (•) marks a differing row.
Hyundai Tucson Volvo XC60
Fuel (differs) Hybrid Plug-in Hybrid
Model years (differs) 2020-now 2017-now
From (indicative) (differs) € 41,995 € 67,995
Status Available Available
RatingsRating figures: higher is better (scale 0-100). What each category measures is explained on the methodology page.
Reliability (differs) 74/100 73/100
Efficiency (differs) 71/100 70/100
Combined efficiency rating (differs) 70/100
Value retention (differs) n/a 68/100
Sustainability (environmental impact) (differs) 53/100 62/100
Practicality 78/100 78/100
Specifications
Power (hp) (differs) 215 350
0–100 km/h (s) (differs) 8.2 5.7
Top speed (km/h) (differs) 187 180
Length (mm) (differs) 4510 4708
Width (mm) (differs) 1865 1902
Height (mm) (differs) 1650 1656
Kerb weight (kg) (differs) 1650 2150
Max. towing weight, braked (kg) (differs) 1650 2250
Boot (l) (differs) 577 468
Consumption WLTP (l/100km) (differs) 5.6 1
Battery (kWh) (differs) 14.7
Electric WLTP range (km) (differs) 78
Body style SUV SUV
Seats 5 5
Doors 5 5

OEM datasheets + RDW + ADAC (see methodology); rating and reference dates are listed per figure

Show sources and reference dates per rating
  • Hyundai Tucson · Reliability: ADAC breakdown statistics 2025 (compact-SUV segment) + aggregated owner reviews + RDW recall data · reference date 2026-05-18
  • Hyundai Tucson · Efficiency: Owner-reported l/100km vs WLTP 5.6, public forums · reference date 2026-05-18
  • Hyundai Tucson · Combined efficiency rating: WLTP consumption 5.6 l/100km (manufacturer figure) full hybrid, editorial weighting vs segment · reference date 2026-05-18
  • Hyundai Tucson · Practicality: 577 l boot, roomy rear bench, 1,650 kg braked towing weight; editorial weighting of specs · reference date 2026-05-18
  • Hyundai Tucson · Value retention: Insufficient stable residual-value data since the facelift price changes · reference date 2026-05-18
  • Hyundai Tucson · Sustainability (environmental impact): WLTP consumption manufacturer figure hybrid without plug + LCA indication ICCT 2024 (segment), reference date 2026-05-21 · reference date 2026-05-21
  • Volvo XC60 · Reliability: ADAC breakdown statistics 2025 (segment) + aggregated owner reviews + RDW recall data · reference date 2026-05-18
  • Volvo XC60 · Efficiency: Owner-reported consumption strongly dependent on charging vs. WLTP 1.0 l/100km (public forums) · reference date 2026-05-18
  • Volvo XC60 · Practicality: Boot 468 l + towing weight 2,250 kg + EV range 78 km vs. segment (manufacturer figure) · reference date 2026-05-18
  • Volvo XC60 · Value retention: Residual-value indication from valuation guides, plug-in SUV segment (historical, indicative) · reference date 2026-05-18
  • Volvo XC60 · Sustainability (environmental impact): WLTP consumption manufacturer figure PHEV (depends on electric-driving fraction) + LCA indication ICCT 2024 (segment), reference date 2026-05-21 · reference date 2026-05-21

Who they are

A short write-up on each car, one paragraph apiece. We describe them on their own terms rather than picking a winner.

Profile · NX4, facelift (2024)

Hyundai Tucson

Compact SUV with full hybrid drivetrain (1.6 T-GDi + electric motor), facelift of the fourth generation. System power around 215 hp; WLTP consumption around 5.6 l/100km (manufacturer figure, not measured by us). Boot 577 l, braked towing weight 1,650 kg. Indicative from-price; check the official configurator for the current figure.

Profile · II T6 Recharge plug-in (facelift 2024)

Volvo XC60

Mid-size SUV on the SPA platform, on the market since 2017 and facelifted in 2024. The T6 Recharge plug-in couples a 2.0 petrol engine to an electric motor and a 14.7 kWh battery; system power 350 hp and WLTP EV range 78 km (manufacturer figure). WLTP consumption 1.0 l/100km depends heavily on the charging ritual; owners report 5 to 8 l/100km once the battery stays empty (public forums, not measured by us).

Continue

+ Compare with another model

Both cars are already filled in — just add a third to compare.

No tax or financial advice. Every figure shows its source and reference date. Always compare with an independent adviser and the official source. Source: OEM datasheets + RDW + ADAC (see methodology); rating and reference dates are listed per figure.