Ford Puma Ford Ranger

Two cars on the same rows. The figures are all here, with their sources, so you can read them yourself and decide what matters.

Comparison table

20 of these rows differ. They sit at the top. Figures come straight from the makers, indicative. A bullet (•) marks a differing row.
Ford Puma Ford Ranger
Fuel (differs) Hybrid Diesel
Model years (differs) 2019-now 2022-now
From (indicative) (differs) € 30,490 € 49,500
Status Available Available
RatingsRating figures: higher is better (scale 0-100). What each category measures is explained on the methodology page.
Reliability (differs) 68/100
Efficiency (differs) 72/100
Practicality (differs) 74/100
Value retention (differs) 70/100
Sustainability (environmental impact) (differs) 58/100
Specifications
Body style (differs) Crossover Pickup
Doors (differs) 5 4
Power (hp) (differs) 125 205
0–100 km/h (s) (differs) 9.8 10.5
Top speed (km/h) (differs) 191 180
Length (mm) (differs) 4186 5370
Width (mm) (differs) 1805 1918
Height (mm) (differs) 1550 1884
Kerb weight (kg) (differs) 1301 2257
Consumption WLTP (l/100km) (differs) 5.4
Max. towing weight, braked (kg) (differs) 1100
Boot (l) (differs) 456
Seats 5 5

OEM datasheets + RDW + ADAC (see methodology); rating and reference dates are listed per figure

Show sources and reference dates per rating
  • Ford Puma · Reliability: ADAC breakdown statistics 2025 (segment) + aggregated owner reviews + RDW recall data · reference date 2026-05-18
  • Ford Puma · Efficiency: Owner-reported real-world consumption vs WLTP 5.4 l/100km (public forums) · reference date 2026-05-18
  • Ford Puma · Practicality: Boot 456 l incl. deep underfloor compartment vs B-segment crossovers (manufacturer figure) · reference date 2026-05-18
  • Ford Puma · Value retention: Residual-value indication from segment valuation guides (historical, indicative) · reference date 2026-05-18
  • Ford Puma · Sustainability (environmental impact): WLTP consumption manufacturer figure, hybrid without plug + LCA indication ICCT 2024 (segment), reference date 2026-05-21 · reference date 2026-05-21

Who they are

A short write-up on each car, one paragraph apiece. We describe them on their own terms rather than picking a winner.

Profile · 1.0 EcoBoost mHEV (facelift 2024)

Ford Puma

Compact crossover on the Fiesta platform with a 48V mild hybrid. Strong point is the deep underfloor compartment ("MegaBox", part of the 456 l boot) for the class. The 1.0 EcoBoost mHEV reaches WLTP 5.4 l/100km; owners report 6-6.5 l/100km in practice (public forums, not measured by us). Braked towing weight 1,100 kg (manufacturer figure).

Profile · (VI, 2022+)

Ford Ranger

Sixth-generation Ranger with a 2.0 EcoBlue bi-turbo diesel, up to 3,500 kg towing capacity and a wider load bed (manufacturer figure, indicative). Available as XLT, Wildtrak and Raptor with permanent four-wheel drive.

Continue

+ Compare with another model

Both cars are already filled in — just add a third to compare.

No tax or financial advice. Every figure shows its source and reference date. Always compare with an independent adviser and the official source. Source: OEM datasheets + RDW + ADAC (see methodology); rating and reference dates are listed per figure.