Ford Puma Nissan Juke

Two cars on the same rows. The figures are all here, with their sources, so you can read them yourself and decide what matters.

Comparison table

14 of these rows differ. They sit at the top. Figures come straight from the makers, indicative. A bullet (•) marks a differing row.
Ford Puma Nissan Juke
From (indicative) (differs) € 30,490 € 31,990
Status Available Available
Fuel Hybrid Hybrid
Model years 2019-now 2019-now
RatingsRating figures: higher is better (scale 0-100). What each category measures is explained on the methodology page.
Reliability (differs) 68/100 72/100
Practicality (differs) 74/100 60/100
Value retention (differs) 70/100 65/100
Efficiency 72/100 72/100
Sustainability (environmental impact) 58/100 58/100
Specifications
Body style (differs) Crossover SUV
Power (hp) (differs) 125 143
0–100 km/h (s) (differs) 9.8 10.1
Top speed (km/h) (differs) 191 166
Length (mm) (differs) 4186 4210
Width (mm) (differs) 1805 1800
Height (mm) (differs) 1550 1595
Kerb weight (kg) (differs) 1301 1400
Max. towing weight, braked (kg) (differs) 1100 750
Boot (l) (differs) 456 354
Seats 5 5
Doors 5 5
Consumption WLTP (l/100km) 5.4 5.4

OEM datasheets + RDW + ADAC (see methodology); rating and reference dates are listed per figure

Show sources and reference dates per rating
  • Ford Puma · Reliability: ADAC breakdown statistics 2025 (segment) + aggregated owner reviews + RDW recall data · reference date 2026-05-18
  • Ford Puma · Efficiency: Owner-reported real-world consumption vs WLTP 5.4 l/100km (public forums) · reference date 2026-05-18
  • Ford Puma · Practicality: Boot 456 l incl. deep underfloor compartment vs B-segment crossovers (manufacturer figure) · reference date 2026-05-18
  • Ford Puma · Value retention: Residual-value indication from segment valuation guides (historical, indicative) · reference date 2026-05-18
  • Ford Puma · Sustainability (environmental impact): WLTP consumption manufacturer figure, hybrid without plug + LCA indication ICCT 2024 (segment), reference date 2026-05-21 · reference date 2026-05-21
  • Nissan Juke · Reliability: ADAC breakdown statistics 2025 (segment) + aggregated owner reviews + RDW recall data · reference date 2026-05-18
  • Nissan Juke · Efficiency: Owner-reported l/100km vs WLTP 5.4 (public forums), city consumption works out favourably · reference date 2026-05-18
  • Nissan Juke · Practicality: Boot 354 l + towing weight 750 kg vs compact-SUV segment (manufacturer figure) · reference date 2026-05-18
  • Nissan Juke · Value retention: Residual-value indication from valuation guides, compact-SUV segment (historical, indicative) · reference date 2026-05-18
  • Nissan Juke · Sustainability (environmental impact): WLTP consumption manufacturer figure, hybrid without plug + LCA indication ICCT 2024 (segment), reference date 2026-05-21 · reference date 2026-05-21

Who they are

A short write-up on each car, one paragraph apiece. We describe them on their own terms rather than picking a winner.

Profile · 1.0 EcoBoost mHEV (facelift 2024)

Ford Puma

Compact crossover on the Fiesta platform with a 48V mild hybrid. Strong point is the deep underfloor compartment ("MegaBox", part of the 456 l boot) for the class. The 1.0 EcoBoost mHEV reaches WLTP 5.4 l/100km; owners report 6-6.5 l/100km in practice (public forums, not measured by us). Braked towing weight 1,100 kg (manufacturer figure).

Profile · F16 Hybrid (facelift 2024)

Nissan Juke

Compact SUV on the Alliance CMF-B platform, shared with the Renault Captur. The Hybrid version combines a 1.6 petrol engine with a main electric motor and a starter-generator; system power 143 hp and WLTP 5.4 l/100km (manufacturer figure). Boot 354 l, braked towing weight 750 kg. Owners praise the city consumption; on the motorway they report higher figures (public forums, not measured by us).

Continue

+ Compare with another model

Both cars are already filled in — just add a third to compare.

No tax or financial advice. Every figure shows its source and reference date. Always compare with an independent adviser and the official source. Source: OEM datasheets + RDW + ADAC (see methodology); rating and reference dates are listed per figure.